Land Acquisition Rules: With the expansion of infrastructure and industrial projects across the country, land acquisition has become a very sensitive issue. In such a situation, the question often arises whether the government can acquire a citizen’s land without his consent? The answer is – yes, it can in some situations. But, there is a fixed legal process for this, which cannot be ignored.

The government has the right to acquire land from the public in ‘public interest’. Both the Constitution of the country and the acquisition law allow this. Currently, the government acquires land under the ‘Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013’ (LARR Act).

This law ensures that whenever the government or a private company acquires land in ‘public interest’, the landowners and the affected families get proper compensation. If a house is acquired, then a new house is given, or its reasonable price, or help in construction.

This law was brought in place of the old Land Acquisition Act of 1894 to increase transparency, prevent forceful acquisition and make social impact assessment mandatory. It provides for compensation of at least 2 times the market value in rural areas and 1 times the market value in urban areas. Along with this, the requirement of resettling the affected family and social consent has also been made mandatory.

What is the stand of the Supreme Court on land acquisition?

The Supreme Court made its view on land acquisition very clear in the case ‘Sukh Dutt Ratra vs State of Himachal Pradesh’ (2022). In its decision, it said that the government cannot forcibly take possession of a person’s private property without due process and without compensation. This case was related to Article 300-A of the Indian Constitution, which says that no person can be deprived of his property without due process authorized by law.

The court clearly said that acquisition without due process is not only a violation of the Constitution, but it is also a violation of human rights. The Supreme Court said in clear words that if the government has to acquire someone’s land, then it will have to follow the prescribed process of land acquisition and it is mandatory to give proper compensation.

Is it necessary to take consent for land acquisition?

The answer depends on the purpose for which the land is being acquired. According to the LARR Act, 2013, consent is necessary in some cases. In some cases, land can be acquired without consent. However, in both cases, compensation and then settlement of the affected families will have to be arranged.

How much compensation will be given in land acquisition?

In the LARR Act, better compensation has been arranged for the affected people. In rural areas, at least 2 times the market price will be given as compensation. Whereas, in urban areas, 1 times the market price is given. Apart from this, there is also a provision for rehabilitation, cash assistance and alternative land or employment.

However, there have been disputes over the ‘market price’. The government ‘circle rate’ is often much lower than the ground reality. Due to this, farmers and land owners feel cheated.

Can you refuse to give land?

If the land acquisition is in the public interest and due process of law has been followed, the right of individual refusal is limited. However, in certain situations, the affected person or group can file a petition in the court. Such as:

There may be a flaw in the acquisition process.

There is no justice in rehabilitation or compensation.

There may be a violation of the rules relating to consent.