Samsung Galaxy S26, Apple iPhone 17, and Vivo X300 Comparing in terms of cost, performance, camera, and display

Samsung Galaxy S26, Apple iPhone 17, and Vivo X300: The Samsung Galaxy S26 series has been formally introduced by Samsung to both international and Indian markets. With this release, the corporation takes on the Vivo X300 and the Apple iPhone 17, both of which were released last year, in a fierce flagship rivalry. All three smartphones have sophisticated camera systems and strong performance. They are intended for customers who desire high-quality photos, quickness, and seamless multitasking. Choosing the appropriate device becomes much more difficult as a result of this combination. The price, camera quality, display features, and performance of the Samsung Galaxy S26, Apple iPhone 17, and Vivo X300 are compared in depth below.

Vivo X300, Apple iPhone 17, and Samsung Galaxy S26: Display

A 6.3-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a refresh rate of 1Hz to 120Hz and Vision Booster comes with the Samsung Galaxy S26. Similarly, a 6.3-inch OLED display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz is included with the Apple iPhone 17. It is distinctive, though, because it has a high peak brightness of 3,000 nits and an Always-On Display. The Vivo X300, on the other hand, has a slightly bigger 6.31-inch AMOLED display with SCHOTT Xensation XT Core protection and a refresh rate of 120 Hz.

Vivo X300, Apple iPhone 17, and Samsung Galaxy S26: Performance comparison

With its Exynos 2600 engine, 12GB RAM, and 512GB storage, the Samsung Galaxy S26 offers a full flagship experience in the performance category. Conversely, the A19 processor, 8GB RAM, and up to 512GB of internal storage power the Apple iPhone 17.

Samsung Galaxy S26, Vivo X300, and Apple iPhone 17: Battery

With its massive 6,040mAh battery, 90W fast charging, and 40W wireless charging, the Vivo X300 unquestionably dominates the field in terms of battery capacity. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S26 boasts a comparatively modest 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging, wireless charging, and Wireless PowerShare capabilities. However, the iPhone 17 from Apple has a battery capacity of 3,692 mAh.

Vivo X300 vs Apple iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Camera

The Samsung Galaxy S26’s optics include a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, a 12MP ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 50MP primary sensor with 2x optical quality zoom. Additionally, it features a 12MP front-facing camera for selfies.

In terms of comparison, the Apple iPhone 17 has an 18MP front-facing camera, a 48MP ultra-wide-angle camera, and a 48MP primary sensor with a 2x telephoto lens as part of its Dual Fusion arrangement. This specific gadget emphasizes overall performance and computational photography.

With a 50MP Sony IMX885 LYT-602 telephoto sensor, a 50MP ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 200MP primary camera, the Vivo X300, on the other hand, is all about being the best in terms of numbers. Its 50MP front-facing camera makes it the best for snapping selfies.

Vivo X300, Apple iPhone 17, and Samsung Galaxy S26: Cost in India

At Rs 87,999, the Samsung Galaxy S26 made its debut in the Indian market, whereas the Apple iPhone  17 starts at Rs 82,900. In comparison, the Vivo X300 is priced at Rs 75,999.