Reno 13 5G vs Galaxy A16 5G: In the mid-range smartphone segment, which is moderately popular, Oppo Reno 13 5G and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G are two serious competitors for those who are looking for phones priced under ₹40,000. Both offer 5G with more or less identical specifications, yet their specs tell two different tales. Let us uncover how they outdo one another in terms of display, performance, camera, and battery.
Read More: OnePlus 13 vs OnePlus 13R – Which One to Choose?
Read More: Motorola Edge 50 Pro 5G VS Motorola Edge 50 Fusion – Which One Is Better?
Design and Build: Slim and Chic
Oppo Reno 13 5G leads the way with its ridonculously thin 7.2mm body and 181g light weight, and is one of the thinnest built of its kind. Its fingerprint reader in the screen gives it a touch of class. Galaxy A16 5G is a fraction thicker at 7.9mm and a fraction heavier at 192g and features a side fingerprint reader. They skip the headphone jack and FM radio but include an IR blaster, allowing you to use them as a remote control, much like what Oppo offers.
Display: Smooth and Colorful
Oppo Reno 13 5G is equipped with a small but sharp 6.59-inch AMOLED screen with 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and stunning 460 ppi pixel density. It has a refresh rate support of up to 120Hz and touch sampling of 240Hz, suited for media professionals and gamers alike. Samsung A16 has a bigger 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen with a lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a 90Hz refresh rate. Galaxy’s screen is decent, but Reno 13 takes the lead with improved sharpness, 1200 nits of brightness, and color modes such as 100% DCI-P3 coverage.
Performance and Storage: Power vs Practicality
In the engine, Oppo Reno 13 5G is equipped with the latest MediaTek Dimensity 8350 processor that clocks at 3.35GHz. With 8GB of RAM and an additional 8GB of virtual RAM, it promises quick multitasking and instant app launch. It offers 128GB of storage but lacks microSD expansion. Galaxy A16 has a less powerful Exynos 1330 chip at 2.4GHz, 8GB of RAM, and up to 1.5TB of expandable storage. Storage or not, Samsung wins here, but where speed is concerned, Oppo takes the lead.
Cameras: Sharp Shooters with Slight Edge
Both devices share the same triple camera configuration at the rear with a 50MP primary sensor. Reno 13 comes with an ultra-wide 8MP and 2MP macro camera along with a 50MP front camera to record video at 4K@60fps. Samsung A16 compromises on a front camera of just 13MP and video recording at 1080p@30fps. For camera and vlog lovers, the Oppo provides better image quality and stronger video capabilities.
Battery and Charging: Pace and Speed
Oppo Reno 13 5G takes the win again with a gargantuan 5600mAh battery and turbo-fast 80W charging, along with reverse charging. Galaxy A16 5G boasts a respectable 5000mAh battery and 25W fast charging, which falls behind in capacity and speed. Reno keeps power-thirsty consumers plugged in sooner and longer.
Verdict: Oppo Takes the Lead
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G would be a good choice for everyday users, especially given the expandable storage and budget-friendliness. Alternatively, however, if one wants luxury mid-range, Oppo Reno 13 5G is a more desirable choice with a better screen, more powerful processor, better camera setup, and faster charging. As long as one is not on a shoestring budget, Oppo’s alternative offers better value for money.