Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo V50 vs Samsung Galaxy A17: Three new handsets for 5G, Samsung Galaxy A56, Vivo V50, and Samsung Galaxy A17, are now the center of discussion for consumers who are considering their alternatives based on many price tags. Each of them offers its own performance, camera configuration, screen quality, and battery capacity. In case you are going to upgrade after a few months, below is a review that breaks down their features to allow you to make a knowledgeable decision.
Read More: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Vivo X Fold 3: Foldable Giants
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo V50 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 Processor
Samsung Galaxy A56 is driven by the Exynos 1580 processor with a 2.9GHz octa-core. It is coupled with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage, so it does a pretty good job when used in normal ways. Vivo V50 employs Snapdragon 7 Gen3, which is clocked at 2.63GHz. It also features 8GB RAM with an additional 8GB virtual RAM, which makes multitasking very smooth. Samsung Galaxy A17 is equipped with the Exynos 1330 chip at 2.4GHz, supported by 6GB of RAM. Out of the three, Vivo V50 appears to be a bit more multitasking-oriented oriented but Galaxy A56 provides more stability. A17 is comparatively more entry-level in terms of quality.
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo V50 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 Display and Battery
Galaxy A56 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and 1200 nits brightness. It is equipped with a 5000mAh battery powered by 45W fast charging. Vivo V50 has a slightly lower 6.77-inch AMOLED screen but with significantly higher brightness levels of up to 4500 nits, HDR10+ certification, and 90W FlashCharge for its 6000mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy A17 also has a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen, but with a 90Hz refresh rate cap. It carries the same 5000mAh battery but slower charging at 25W. Vivo V50 is obviously the champion in brightness, HDR10+, and charging speed here.
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo V50 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 Camera
Galaxy A56 features a 50MP, 12MP, and 5MP triple camera at the rear and a 12MP front camera. Vivo V50 beats all this with two 50MP rear cameras and a 50MP front camera, which is a superior choice for selfie enthusiasts. Samsung Galaxy A17 goes down the minimalist path with 50MP primary, 5MP, and 2MP back cameras and a 13MP front-facing camera. To capture nice photos and nice quality selfies, Vivo V50 has more than enough.
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Vivo V50 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 Price
Samsung Galaxy A56 costs ₹38,999 and hence is in the upper mid-range. Vivo V50 costs ₹32,999 after a minimal price cut, thus it is a budget premium phone. Samsung Galaxy A17 is the cheapest at ₹18,999, for those who need 5G but are not willing to spend too much.
Conclusion
If you’re looking for a balanced phone with decent power and build, Galaxy A56 is a good pick. For those who value camera quality, battery life, and super-fast charging, Vivo V50 offers better value for money. Budget-conscious buyers can go for Galaxy A17, though it sacrifices some advanced features. Overall, Vivo V50 comes across as the strongest all-rounder in this lineup.
