Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Vivo T4R 5G: Samsung and Vivo are both targeting mid-range users with their new 5G phones, Galaxy A36 5G and Vivo T4R 5G. Both promise strong performance, premium looks, and solid battery life, but they differ in some key areas that could influence your buying decision. Let’s break down how they compare in terms of processor, display, camera, and battery before deciding which one offers better value.
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Vivo T4R 5G Processor
Galaxy A36 5G operates on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor with an octa-core chip clocked at 2.4 GHz. It is equipped with 8 GB RAM and 128 GB storage. Performance is reasonable for casual use, but it’s not made for heavy multitasking or prolonged gaming sessions.
Vivo T4R 5G, however, is based on MediaTek’s Dimensity 7400 chipset with a clock speed of 2.6 GHz, which is marginally quicker. The phone also offers 8 GB RAM with an extra 8 GB of virtual RAM to provide a smooth run. For gamers or app-switching enthusiasts, Vivo emerges winner in pure speed and responsiveness.
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Vivo T4R 5G Display and Battery
Both smartphones have 120 Hz AMOLED screens, but Samsung has a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen, while Vivo has a 6.77-inch AMOLED display with P3 Wide Color Gamut. Vivo’s screen delivers richer colors, while Samsung supports more brightness at 1200 nits, thus making it more convenient to use outdoors.
Battery-wise, Samsung has a 5000 mAh battery with 45 W fast charging, while Vivo T4R 5G has a larger 5700 mAh battery with 44 W charging and also reverse charging. So, if you prefer longer battery backup and greater versatility, Vivo takes this round.
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs Vivo T4R 5G Camera
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G features a triple rear camera system: 50 MP primary, 8 MP ultra-wide-angle, and 5 MP macro, providing flexibility to shoot in various styles. It captures 4K videos at 30 fps and features a 12 MP front camera.
Vivo T4R 5G features a dual rear camera with a 50 MP primary lens and a 2 MP auxiliary sensor. Though it lacks an ultrawide lens, its 32 MP Sony IMX882 sensor front camera takes superior selfies. Hence, in terms of rear camera diversity, Samsung is superior, but in terms of front camera resolution, Vivo is superior.
Price Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G now fetches ₹28,499 following a 3% price reduction, and Vivo T4R 5G is cheaper at ₹18,549 after having a 5% price reduction. Based on Vivo’s superior battery, performance, and selfie camera, it is a better value for money, whereas Samsung is more attractive to those who like a polished display and solid brand experience.
Conclusion
Each of these phones offers sound features in the mid-range category. Galaxy A36 5G is great for individuals who desire a brighter screen, brand reputation, and a well-rounded configuration. Vivo T4R 5G is for customers who desire greater power, superior selfies, and longer battery life at a reduced cost. In general, Vivo appears to be the wiser purchase for budget-conscious customers, with Samsung remaining robust for users who value display performance and long-term dependability.
