Poco X6 Neo vs Realme Narzo 60x : In such a competitive market as India, the budget mid-range segment for 5G smartphones sees a tussle between two devices, the Poco X6 Neo and Realme Narzo 60x. The devices look great, are priced attractively, and perform well, with aesthetics, wonderful design, smooth displays, and decent performance being some of the attraction points for this target customer. This is a fair comparison that could well assist you in deciding which is more based on your preference.
Design and Display
The X6 Neo is a wonder to behold in a simple yet understated manner with an ultra-slim profile. At just 7.7mm, it is among the thinnest phones in this category. It gives you a 6.67-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a refresh rate of 120Hz, providing an apparent view with sheer blacks while treating your fingers with buttery smoothness while gaming or scrolling through.
The Narzo 60x has a very bulkier design in comparison, having a plastic back with a circular camera module. It has a 6.72-inch FHD+ IPS LCD that boasts a 120Hz refresh rate just like Poco’s. It is bigger and silky smooth but does not begin to compare to the quality of an AMOLED screen.
In short, better display quality and thinner appearance become a merit for the Narzo 60x; larger display but lesser visual appeal, and finer specification for the Poco.
Performance and Software
Poco X6 is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, along with the availability of up to 12GB RAM and 256GB storage. Thus, the daily work, social networking, and moderate gaming are executed in a super-smooth manner. MIUI 14 is used here on board running atop Android 13.
Realme Narzo 60x also shares the same Dimension 6100+ processor; hence, it has almost the same constructed performance. It has Realme’s homemade Realme UI 4.0, based on Android 13, so it can be considered somewhat cleaner than MIUI.
Real-world performance is nearly equal in both phones because both use the same chipset, but you may find Realme to be a better alternative for fans of a minimalist interface.
Camera Comparison
The camera side is wrapped in a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor in the Poco X6 Neo. At the same time, it produces pretty decent photography in broad daylight with sharp details and good colours.
It sports a 64MP primary camera and a 2MP depth sensor for the Narzo 60x as well. That said, because of the higher megapixel count, images might be slightly more detailed from Narzo under well-lit conditions.
Selfies can be taken using the 8MP front camera found in both smartphones. They will yield fairly standard results, sufficient to post on social media.
However, if camera quality is the major factor, then Realme Narzo 60x is the winner with a higher resolution primary sensor.
Battery and Charging
Both phones are powered by 5000mAh batteries coupled with 33W fast charging. With this setup, the battery would ideally last a full day for most consumers and would charge to around 50% in under 30 minutes.
Battery life is very good for both models, so there is no clear winner here. It’s a tie.
Storage and Variants
The Poco X6 Neo is launched in two variants: 8GB+128GB and 12GB+256GB.
The Realme Narzo 60x is available in different variants as 4GB+128GB and 6GB+128GB:
If you want more RAM and storage, Poco X6 Neo has more flexible offerings, especially the 12GB variant, which is targeted at power users.
Price in India
Poco X6 Neo starts from around ₹13,999.
Realme Narzo 60x starts at ₹10,999.
So, the Poco X6 Neo has a better display and design, while Narzo 60x is the budget-friendly one.
Poco X6 Neo is ideal for those looking for:
- Premium AMOLED display
- Ultra-slim and modern design
- Higher RAM and storage options
Realme Narzo 60x is for those looking for:
- Lower price point
- Slightly better camera quality
- Cleaner lighter UI experience
Both Poco X6 Neo and Realme Narzo 60x have good value for money at 5G, 120Hz displays, and excellent performance. The style and screen quality would be winning points for Poco while Narzo will be an exception with the camera and price. Hence, it comes down to which matters more to you—premium visuals or cost-effective performance.