Vivo Y39 vs Samsung Galaxy A16: If you’re looking to purchase a new budget 5G smartphone and are torn between Vivo Y39 and Samsung Galaxy A16, you’re not alone. Both devices offer good specs at a low price, but they both have their own merits. From camera to display and battery to chipset, there is a lot happening here. Let’s decipher it and see which one offers you more value for money.
Read More: iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro: What’s New in 2025?
Read More: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Samsung Galaxy S24: Worth the Upgrade?
Processor of Vivo Y39 5G and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Vivo Y39 is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 processor, running at 2.2GHz, and also comes with 8GB of RAM. It provides silky smooth daily performance and manages multitasking quite decently. Samsung Galaxy A16, on the other hand, features a MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chip, running at 2.4GHz. Though both offer 8GB RAM and 128GB storage, Samsung’s processor is marginally faster. Additionally, it supports memory expansion up to 1.5TB using a hybrid card slot, compared to Vivo.
Display and Battery
Samsung leads on the display front with a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen and Full HD+ resolution. It delivers sharp visuals and rich colors, with a 90Hz refresh rate. Vivo, however, has a 6.68-inch LCD screen that is fractionally smaller with HD+ resolution only, but a faster 120Hz refresh rate. If smooth scrolling is your thing, Vivo takes the day, but if you prioritize sharper quality, then Samsung is preferable. Vivo comes with an enormous 6500mAh battery and 44W fast charging, with a big advantage for power users. Samsung holds on to a 5000mAh battery and 25W fast charging.
Vivo Y39 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Camera
The Vivo Y39 sports a 50MP + 2MP dual rear camera and an 8MP front camera. The device can record 1080p video and provides satisfactory output in daylight. The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a triple camera with 50MP + 5MP + 2MP sensors and a superior 13MP front camera. The devices can both record FHD videos at 30fps, but Samsung’s front camera and additional rear sensor make its set more capable.
Price of the Devices
Vivo Y39 can be bought at ₹16,999 from prominent platforms such as Croma and Amazon. Samsung Galaxy A16 costs a bit more at ₹17,499. Although the difference is minor, it may influence your decision based on features you might want.
Exchange Offers and Additional Discounts
Amazon and Croma are providing exchange offers and old models from ₹14,449 for Vivo and ₹14,448 for Samsung, making them within reach. Vivo’s price has been steady, whereas Samsung’s price has increased by approximately ₹1,384 in the last month, so it’s better to look for any ongoing discounts.
Conclusion
Samsung Galaxy A16 provides a superior display, more versatile storage, and a marginally superior camera setup, but Vivo Y39 takes the lead in battery capacity, charging speed, and refresh rate. If camera and display sharpness are your priorities, Samsung is the correct choice. But if battery, smooth UI, and affordability at a lower cost are your priorities, Vivo Y39 is a compelling case.